Should Nations Use Strategic Trade Policies?
To compete globally a nation must have industries that are
competitive towards the global market.
These industries should be protected and nurtured with strategic trade
policies (Daniels, et al, 2009).
Governments have many ways to enact strategic policies like
protection of markets. Foe example, a
government can protect an infant industry from foreign imports to allow it to
grow, develop and reduce costs in the domestic market. Governments also need to act in concert with
or sometimes against political action committees comprised of lobbyists with
their own agenda (Daniels, et al, 2009).
A strategic plan can help a nation’s industries compete
against others. When any nation makes
strategic trade agreements, especially those protecting a particular industry,
another industry or nation will suffer for it.
As one group prospers, another has to be on the loosing end of the
balanced equation (Daniels, et al, 2009).
Political agendas are another reason for a strategic trade
policy. If a nation identifies a strong
market it may choose to protect it with a strategic policy. The government should target the reasons the
industry is strong and target those aspects for the maximum effect of the
policy (Daniels, et al, 2009). With the
passing of NAFTA, trade and jobs was not the only topic under discussion. The environment was as well, especially
concerning Mexico. Many feared Mexico’s
lackluster record of sustainable production would lead to either unfair
advantage or environmental disaster, or more likely both. NAFTA as a trade policy was set up to allow
free trade between Mexico, the united States and Canada but through PAC efforts
and other groups, it also mandated certain environmental milestones for Mexico
to achieve for its exports (Evans and Kay, 2008). This strategic policy was found by many to be
both necessary and beneficial to the health of all three nations.
One aspect of the political agenda is establishing a strategic
trade policy for environmental reasons.
As a former marine biologist I have witnessed some compelling reasons
for trade policies first hand. In contemporary times, airplanes, ships, and
trucks have all been used to transport goods from one part of the world to
another. In addition to transporting goods between regions, airplanes, ships,
and trucks have also managed to transport a whole host of invasive plant and
animal species (also known as alien or non-native species) from one
geographical region of the world to another.
There are many ways in which airplanes, ships, and trucks have
transported invasive plant and animal species from one part of the world to
another. Non- native animal species have sometimes managed to lodge themselves
in the landing gear of airplanes and, as such, they have traveled as stowaways
from one country to another. Similarly, a number of marine alien species have
been introduced unintentionally into a region by ships dumping their ballast
water. Cargo ships frequently carry ballast water in order to increase vessel
stability when they are not carrying full loads. When these ships come into
port, this ballast water must be released before cargo can be loaded. This
means of species introductions is salient and very recently the problem of
managing invasive species that have been introduced unintentionally into a
particular region by means of the dumping of ballast water (Batabyal, 2006). A
strategic policy banning import from certain regions, or via certain methods
can protect domestic agriculture and wildlife stocks. I feel this is a well-justified rationale for
strategic trade policy.
The best defense is a good offense, and countering another
strategic policy whether political or economic is important. Opening up to foreign competition leaves the
domestic industries vulnerable. Often
the first to import are well-experienced competitors that can exploit nascent
industry weakness in the domestic firms.
These existing international firms already have distribution
relationships and production efficiencies worked out. Strategic policy to mitigate these advantages
in the domestic market can help an infant industry grow large enough to compete
globally (Daniels, et al, 2009). If the regulator has first mover advantage in
terms of setting trade policy, they will often come out ahead. Without first mover advantage, the
reactionary policy may be too late to prevent a negative welfare impact on the
domestic population (Foros, et al, 2009).
Ways a trade a strategic policy can be enacted is through
sanctions, quotas, restrictions, enhancements and subsidies. All of these techniques can strategically
help a nations domestic industry or better prepare a specific group for global
trade (Daniels, et al, 2009).
REFERENCES
Batabyal, A.G. (2007). International invasive species management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 21, 717-727.
Daniels, J. D., Radebaugh, L. H., & Sullivan, D. P. (2009). International Business (12 ed.). (S. Yagan, Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Evans, R., & Kay, T. (2008). How Environmentalists "greened" trade policy. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 970-992.
Foros, O., Kind, H., & Sorgard, L. (2009). Domestic regulation of international trade. Journal of Industrial Competetive Trade, 9, 1-16.
No comments:
Post a Comment